Difference between revisions of "Biomolecular sampling"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
ElijahCarson (talk | contribs) |
|||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
*What are the challenges? | *What are the challenges? | ||
*Examples of successes? | *Examples of successes? | ||
+ | *Are there broad classes of algorithm that can be used to organize our thinking/writing? Here is a first stab at this kind of organization: | ||
+ | **Biased dynamics algorithms, dating at least to Voter's PRL, and continuing through Mcammon's "accelerated MD" and then to Metadynamics | ||
+ | ***A critical distinction needs to be made between methods that bias the potential energy surface, and those that bias a PMF | ||
+ | ***The discussion of metadynamics and other PMF bias methods obviously links in to the discussion of CVs. | ||
+ | **Algorithms which attempt to sample the hard to sample by mixing in states from an easier to sample distribution, dating at least to the replica exchange approach of Swendsen. | ||
+ | ***These are subdivided into exchange-type methods (multiple parallel walkers) and expanded-ensemble methods (single walker methods) | ||
+ | **Umbrella sampling, which seems in a way to bridge these two: It can be viewed as sampling on a biased potential energy surface, or as mixing together samples under different potentials. | ||
+ | **Nondynamical methods | ||
+ | ***Library Monte Carlo | ||
Some topics: | Some topics: | ||
Line 24: | Line 33: | ||
General Issues | General Issues | ||
*Defining collective variables | *Defining collective variables | ||
+ | *Sampling vs Search: This is an important distinction that is often glossed over in review articles | ||
+ | **Sampling algorithms asymptotically converge to a known distribution (usually Boltzmann) | ||
+ | **Search algorithms do not guarantee any particular distribution, but can be useful as configuration generation engines | ||
+ | ** <nowiki>toppapers.org</nowiki> |
Latest revision as of 08:25, 9 January 2013
Here are some thoughts for biomolecular sampling:
Different issues:
- What are the problems that are being solved?
- What are the different theoretical approaches/philosophies?
- What are the domains of applicability?
- What can be done now?
- What are the challenges?
- Examples of successes?
- Are there broad classes of algorithm that can be used to organize our thinking/writing? Here is a first stab at this kind of organization:
- Biased dynamics algorithms, dating at least to Voter's PRL, and continuing through Mcammon's "accelerated MD" and then to Metadynamics
- A critical distinction needs to be made between methods that bias the potential energy surface, and those that bias a PMF
- The discussion of metadynamics and other PMF bias methods obviously links in to the discussion of CVs.
- Algorithms which attempt to sample the hard to sample by mixing in states from an easier to sample distribution, dating at least to the replica exchange approach of Swendsen.
- These are subdivided into exchange-type methods (multiple parallel walkers) and expanded-ensemble methods (single walker methods)
- Umbrella sampling, which seems in a way to bridge these two: It can be viewed as sampling on a biased potential energy surface, or as mixing together samples under different potentials.
- Nondynamical methods
- Library Monte Carlo
- Biased dynamics algorithms, dating at least to Voter's PRL, and continuing through Mcammon's "accelerated MD" and then to Metadynamics
Some topics:
- Protein folding
- Multicanonical
- Umbrella sampling
- Torrie and Valleau The original paper on umbrella sampling
- Other papers
- Metadynamics
- Sidechain motion
- Rigid body motion
General Issues
- Defining collective variables
- Sampling vs Search: This is an important distinction that is often glossed over in review articles
- Sampling algorithms asymptotically converge to a known distribution (usually Boltzmann)
- Search algorithms do not guarantee any particular distribution, but can be useful as configuration generation engines
- toppapers.org