Difference between revisions of "Biomolecular sampling"

From AlchemistryWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
*What are the challenges?
 
*What are the challenges?
 
*Examples of successes?
 
*Examples of successes?
 +
*Are there broad classes of algorithm that can be used to organize our thinking/writing? Here is a first stab at this kind of organization:
 +
**Biased dynamics algorithms, dating at least to Voter's PRL, and continuing through Mcammon's "accelerated MD" and then to Metadynamics
 +
***A critical distinction needs to be made between methods that bias the potential energy surface, and those that bias a PMF
 +
***The discussion of metadynamics and other PMF bias methods obviously links in to the discussion of CVs.
 +
**Algorithms which attempt to sample the hard to sample by mixing in states from an easier to sample distribution, dating at least to the replica exchange approach of Swendsen.
 +
***These are subdivided into exchange-type methods (multiple parallel walkers) and expanded-ensemble methods (single walker methods)
 +
**Umbrella sampling, which seems in a way to bridge these two: It can be viewed as sampling on a biased potential energy surface, or as mixing together samples under different potentials.
 +
**Nondynamical methods
 +
***Library Monte Carlo
  
 
Some topics:
 
Some topics:
Line 24: Line 33:
 
General Issues
 
General Issues
 
*Defining collective variables
 
*Defining collective variables
 +
*Sampling vs Search: This is an important distinction that is often glossed over in review articles
 +
**Sampling algorithms asymptotically converge to a known distribution (usually Boltzmann)
 +
**Search algorithms do not guarantee any particular distribution, but can be useful as configuration generation engines
 +
** <nowiki>toppapers.org</nowiki>

Latest revision as of 08:25, 9 January 2013

Here are some thoughts for biomolecular sampling:

Different issues:

  • What are the problems that are being solved?
  • What are the different theoretical approaches/philosophies?
  • What are the domains of applicability?
  • What can be done now?
  • What are the challenges?
  • Examples of successes?
  • Are there broad classes of algorithm that can be used to organize our thinking/writing? Here is a first stab at this kind of organization:
    • Biased dynamics algorithms, dating at least to Voter's PRL, and continuing through Mcammon's "accelerated MD" and then to Metadynamics
      • A critical distinction needs to be made between methods that bias the potential energy surface, and those that bias a PMF
      • The discussion of metadynamics and other PMF bias methods obviously links in to the discussion of CVs.
    • Algorithms which attempt to sample the hard to sample by mixing in states from an easier to sample distribution, dating at least to the replica exchange approach of Swendsen.
      • These are subdivided into exchange-type methods (multiple parallel walkers) and expanded-ensemble methods (single walker methods)
    • Umbrella sampling, which seems in a way to bridge these two: It can be viewed as sampling on a biased potential energy surface, or as mixing together samples under different potentials.
    • Nondynamical methods
      • Library Monte Carlo

Some topics:

  • Protein folding
    • Multicanonical
    • Umbrella sampling
    • Metadynamics
  • Sidechain motion
  • Rigid body motion

General Issues

  • Defining collective variables
  • Sampling vs Search: This is an important distinction that is often glossed over in review articles
    • Sampling algorithms asymptotically converge to a known distribution (usually Boltzmann)
    • Search algorithms do not guarantee any particular distribution, but can be useful as configuration generation engines
    • toppapers.org