Difference between revisions of "Template:Cite"
m |
|||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
And understanding that the <nowiki><!-- ... -></nowiki> is the html equivalent of a comment and without it, the extra whitespace would be parsed into the template as well. The noinclude inside the #pos word is to ensure the citation is not done twice. | And understanding that the <nowiki><!-- ... -></nowiki> is the html equivalent of a comment and without it, the extra whitespace would be parsed into the template as well. The noinclude inside the #pos word is to ensure the citation is not done twice. | ||
− | {{ | + | '''TEST''' |
+ | This is a self consistent Test{{Cite | id | fullcite | CUL}} ...and this is a break test {{Cite | break }} ...and a generic reftest<ref name=breakme></ref> | ||
+ | |||
+ | <references /> | ||
</noinclude> | </noinclude> |
Revision as of 08:34, 24 September 2012
USAGE:
{{Cite | SHORTCUT NAME TO USE LATER | FULL NORMAL CITATION | CITE-U-LIKE LINK}}
It should be noted that this page does have a "references" at the bottom of it, but that is not part of the template, you will need to include a "<references />" at the end of your document
If you have already used this reference name once, then you can simply use the {{Cite | REF NAME}}
For those of you wanting to see how and why this works, please check the following pages (in no particular order): String Parsing, Parser Logic, Magic words for refs inside templates, includeonly and noinclude, And understanding that the <!-- ... -> is the html equivalent of a comment and without it, the extra whitespace would be parsed into the template as well. The noinclude inside the #pos word is to ensure the citation is not done twice.
TEST This is a self consistent Test[1] ...and this is a break test [2] ...and a generic reftest[3]
- ↑ fullcite - Find at Cite-U-Like
- ↑ {{{2}}} - [{{{3}}} Find at Cite-U-Like]
- ↑ Cite error: Invalid
<ref>
tag; no text was provided for refs namedbreakme